Proceeding contribution from Baroness Andrews (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 October 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Planning Bill.
Planning Bill
It is more likely that the language of the NPS—I do not have any examples that I can put before the Committee—will address capacity issues and describe what we need as a country. Some of the NPSs will be able to say where we need the schemes. They will be able also to set out criteria for the impacts that the IPC should look for. If there were a location-specific NPS, it would mean that the strategic suitability of the site had been established in principle. The strategic suitability would not then be re-examined by the IPC. The IPC would focus on the impact. In a location-specific NPS, much of the local debate will be had in the context of the NPS, so local anxieties, fears and aspirations will be able to be debated at that level as well.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 704 c52
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Access Disability Conditions of employment Codes of practice Accountability Costs Design Energy Electricity generation Infrastructure Freight Floods Qualifications Planning permission Public appointments Planning Nuclear power Power stations Railways Staff Property development Transport Sustainable development Roads Planning Inspectorate Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements
- Legislation
- Planning Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:23:25 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_497028
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_497028
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_497028