Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Dixon-Smith (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 October 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Planning Bill.

Planning Bill

The problem with raising this at this stage is that, having dealt with the first group of amendments, we have effectively dealt with the question of whether the schedule should stand part of the Bill. In those circumstances, I do not intend to pursue the matter. Schedule 1 agreed to. Clause 2 [Code of conduct]: [Amendments Nos. 22 to 24 not moved.] Clause 2 agreed to. Clause 3 [Register of Commissioners' interests]: [Amendment No. 25 not moved.] Clause 3 agreed to. Clause 4 agreed to. [Amendment No. 26 not moved.] Clause 5 [National policy statements]:

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c96 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access Disability Conditions of employment Codes of practice Accountability Costs Design Energy Electricity generation Infrastructure Freight Floods Qualifications Planning permission Public appointments Planning Nuclear power Power stations Railways Staff Property development Transport Sustainable development Roads Planning Inspectorate Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements
Legislation
Planning Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk