Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Dubs (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 9 October 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Counter-Terrorism Bill.


Counter-Terrorism Bill

moved Amendment No. 28: 28: Clause 20, page 15, line 42, at end insert ““, or (c) breaches— (i) the Human Rights Act 1998, (ii) the UN Convention Against Torture, or (ii) any other relevant international obligation concerning the disclosure and use of information.”” The noble Lord said: This amendment, too, stems from discussions in the Joint Committee on Human Rights. Clause 20(2) says: "““Nothing in that section authorises a disclosure””," and mentions two bits of legislation, the Data Protection Act and the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; so those must be adhered to. The amendment simply seeks to add certain other bits of legislation on a par with the ones that have already been mentioned. I believe the Minister will say that these are not necessary. If itemising the Human Rights Act and the UN convention against torture is not necessary, why are we including the Data Protection Act and the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act? If we mention two bits of legislation in this clause, why cannot we mention others just to be on the safe side? I am not quite clear what the logic is. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c408-9 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Databases Codes of practice Crime prevention Administration of justice Arrests Assets Banks Fingerprints Evidence Intelligence services ICT Genetics Documents GCHQ National security Northern Ireland Police Powers Terrorism Training Right of search Torture Anti-terrorism control orders Freezing of assets
Legislation
Counter-terrorism Bill 2007-08
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk