Proceeding contribution from Lord Woolmer of Leeds (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 16 October 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Planning Bill.
Planning Bill
I apologise that I have not been able to be present since the lunch break. I gather that we will not be here beyond 7 pm but I shall certainly stay for the rest of the debate. I support Amendment No. 191, in the name of my noble friend Lord Judd and the noble Lord, Lord Greaves. It seems inconceivable that national park authorities would not be automatically involved as consultees if land in their areas is affected. I hope very much that, today or on another occasion, the Minister can be positive about that.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 704 c868
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Compensation Community development Compulsory purchase Coastal areas Climate change Elizabeth line County councils Land Energy Electricity generation Infrastructure Hazardous substances Land use District councils Local government Ministerial powers Planning permission Planning Radioactive waste Public participation Parish and town councils National parks Witnesses Renewable energy Seas and oceans Wind power Local strategic partnerships Local development frameworks Marine Management Organisation Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Nationally significant infrastructure projects
- Legislation
- Planning Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:55:48 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_500850
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_500850
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_500850