Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 16 October 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Planning Bill.


Planning Bill

My Lords, I am grateful for my noble friend’s intervention. Does the Minister not understand that there is a difference? I am entirely in favour of a dialogue between applicants and the local community, where it is very local or huge. That is an important part of a good planning application at any level. However, that is a different process from that of consultation of the wider community in a more unbiased and independent manner as part of a general process of consultation and participation—engagement, the Government would say—in that process. The process of dialogue between an applicant who has a strong point of view and the community is different from consulting the community about what it thinks as part of the application. Is there not a conflict here?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c871 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Compensation Community development Compulsory purchase Coastal areas Climate change Elizabeth line County councils Land Energy Electricity generation Infrastructure Hazardous substances Land use District councils Local government Ministerial powers Planning permission Planning Radioactive waste Public participation Parish and town councils National parks Witnesses Renewable energy Seas and oceans Wind power Local strategic partnerships Local development frameworks Marine Management Organisation Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Nationally significant infrastructure projects
Legislation
Planning Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk