---

Planning Bill

I am grateful for that explanation. I take it that the term ““prescribed”” in Clause 36(3)(d) refers to a regulation-making power—I think that I am losing my grip on the terminology here. No, I did not mean that model provisions should be mandatory. The noble Lord has reminded me of a suggestion that I was going to make on how we can move on with this Bill. After a certain point on any given day, noble Lords who have tabled amendments should simply stand up and move them, because the Ministers will always tell us what the amendments’ effect will be. Perhaps we should reserve our remarks for our response to the Minister’s reply. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 180 to 182 not moved.] Clause 37 agreed to. Clause 38 [Register of applications]: [Amendment No. 183 not moved.] Clause 38 agreed to. Clauses 39 and 40 agreed to. Clause 41 [Duty to consult]: [Amendments Nos. 183A to 188 not moved.] Clause 41 agreed to. Clause 42 [Local authorities for purposes of section 41(1)(b)]: [Amendments Nos. 189 to 191 not moved.] Clause 42 agreed to. Clause 43 [Categories for purposes of section 41(1)(d)]: