Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 16 October 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Planning Bill.


Planning Bill

I am sorry to detain the Committee when it probably wants to shut up shop, but I have to pick up the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Jenkin. It is in the nature of the kinds of projects that are likely to be covered by this Bill that they are of national significance. Although of course predominantly local interests will be engaged on issues such as siting and impact, which are certainly at stake with a project such as the expansion of Stansted Airport, there are wider issues in which people who are not necessarily immediately local to the project have a legitimate interest. I understand the point that the noble Lord makes, but to attempt to restrict the way in which people represent those interests to the commissioners when large infrastructural projects are being discussed is not helpful to the notion of transparency and breadth of interest.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c917-8 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Compensation Community development Compulsory purchase Coastal areas Climate change Elizabeth line County councils Land Energy Electricity generation Infrastructure Hazardous substances Land use District councils Local government Ministerial powers Planning permission Planning Radioactive waste Public participation Parish and town councils National parks Witnesses Renewable energy Seas and oceans Wind power Local strategic partnerships Local development frameworks Marine Management Organisation Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Nationally significant infrastructure projects
Legislation
Planning Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk