Proceeding contribution from Lord Judd (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 16 October 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Planning Bill.
Planning Bill
I shall speak to Amendments Nos. 301A and 306A. I do not in any way seek to challenge the importance of national policy statements, but rather to ensure that the provisions already laid out in other detailed planning documentation are also considered by the IPC. As national policy statements will almost certainly be economically focused and demand driven, they could present an unbalanced view. In order to redress that imbalance, I therefore propose that the existing planning policy statements, produced by the Department for Communities and Local Government, and covering such fundamental thematic areas as sustainable development, housing, rural areas and biodiversity, should also be considered a key material consideration for the IPC. As important as the planning statements at national level are the local planning policies in the local development plan covering regional spatial strategy and the local development framework. I am convinced that these should be explicitly part of the Infrastructure Planning Commission’s deliberations. I shall say again how much I appreciate not only the detailed, full and forthcoming way in which my noble friend always treats observation in Committee, but also deeply appreciate the thorough correspondence which she conducts with us outside. I have noted the reassurance offered by my noble friend in her letter to me that national policy statements may—I emphasise the word ““may””—also need to be reflected in planning policy statements and guidance where relevant and appropriate. I hope my noble friend will forgive me if I say that I am not altogether reassured by what she said in her letter. It seems to be the wrong way around. My intention is to ensure that the Infrastructure Planning Commission takes into consideration these other important documents, which I do not believe is required under Clause 101. I suggest that by adopting my amendment the Government will ensure that the IPC considers all relevant planning documentation and not just the national policy statements in isolation.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 704 c922
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Compensation Community development Compulsory purchase Coastal areas Climate change Elizabeth line County councils Land Energy Electricity generation Infrastructure Hazardous substances Land use District councils Local government Ministerial powers Planning permission Planning Radioactive waste Public participation Parish and town councils National parks Witnesses Renewable energy Seas and oceans Wind power Local strategic partnerships Local development frameworks Marine Management Organisation Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Nationally significant infrastructure projects
- Legislation
- Planning Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:55:26 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_500943
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_500943
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_500943