Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Berkeley (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 23 October 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Planning Bill.


Planning Bill

I listened very carefully to the debate and did not want to intervene, but I really must ask the Minister a question and quote a case study. I do not understand this. It is fiendishly complex. A new port at Felixstowe has just received planning permission under what is in effect a Section 106 agreement, which required the best part of £100 million to be spent on upgrading the railway line between Felixstowe and Leeds. I cannot see how a local authority—in this case Suffolk County Council—can create a charging schedule that covers that kind of work and does so regularly. I am sure that it is a very good planning authority, and it may be all right for office blocks, but I do not see how this can work when something like a Section 106 agreement, which I believe this will replace, may be required. How will it work? There must be some negotiation, must there not?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c1288 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Appeals Charities Costs Housing Finance Fees and charges Land Greater London Infrastructure Exemptions Local government Navigation Planning permission Payments Planning Natural gas Railway stations Railways Mayor of London Network Rail Scotland Voluntary organisations Transport Social rented housing Taxation Rented housing Revenue and Customs Community infrastructure levy Norfolk and Suffolk Broads
Legislation
Planning Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk