Proceeding contribution from Lord Berkeley (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 23 October 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Planning Bill.
Planning Bill
Perhaps I may help my noble friend. Network Rail is actually two separate companies. One is a regulated company that is purely to do with operating, maintaining and enhancing the network and the stations, and is not allowed to carry out property development as she suggests. That is the regulated company, which is the subject of my amendment. The other company, which can go off and develop headquarters, would of course pay CIL. I am referring to the first company, which is regulated and cannot do anything outside the regulated railway and the stations.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 704 c1313
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Appeals Charities Costs Housing Finance Fees and charges Land Greater London Infrastructure Exemptions Local government Navigation Planning permission Payments Planning Natural gas Railway stations Railways Mayor of London Network Rail Scotland Voluntary organisations Transport Social rented housing Taxation Rented housing Revenue and Customs Community infrastructure levy Norfolk and Suffolk Broads
- Legislation
- Planning Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:38:12 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_503103
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_503103
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_503103