Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl of Caithness (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 23 October 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Planning Bill.


Planning Bill

I have put my name to the amendment. I was critical of the Minister at Second Reading and suggested that she was quite wrong to allow to come to this House a Bill containing a clause concerning a levy for which only the House of Commons would be allowed to discuss the regulations. Having ploughed through today’s proceedings, I am even more convinced that I was right in saying that the way in which this Bill has been presented is a disgrace. It quite contradicts Mr Healey, who said in the Commons that the Lords would be fully informed and, "““have the maximum information possible””.—[Official Report, Commons, Planning Bill Committee, 31/1/08; col. 632.]" The Bill as it stands is a quite deliberate attempt to stop this House debating the regulations and prevent us having the maximum information available. If that is how the Government wish to treat this House, let them firmly state that on the record.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c1340 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Appeals Charities Costs Housing Finance Fees and charges Land Greater London Infrastructure Exemptions Local government Navigation Planning permission Payments Planning Natural gas Railway stations Railways Mayor of London Network Rail Scotland Voluntary organisations Transport Social rented housing Taxation Rented housing Revenue and Customs Community infrastructure levy Norfolk and Suffolk Broads
Legislation
Planning Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk