Proceeding contribution from Lord Barker of Battle (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 28 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Climate Change Bill [Lords].
Climate Change Bill [Lords]
I cannot give the hon. Gentleman a definitive answer on what the cap should be in 2012, but his general point is correct. We do not see CCS as an alternative to the ETS, but as a complementary policy. The whole point of an emissions trading scheme is that it drives technological change. I am sorry that Ministers do not accept the verdict of Lord Stern—in a report commissioned by the Government—that"““Carbon pricing alone will not be sufficient to reduce emissions on the scale and pace needed””." Perhaps the Minister can say now whether she refutes those words. If not, I hope that she will join us in supporting an emissions performance standard that is the most market friendly approach to driving CCS.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 481 c792
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Aviation Climate change Environment protection Energy Electricity generation Exhaust emissions International cooperation Pollution control Shipping Carbon emissions UK emissions trading scheme
- Legislation
- Climate Change Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:45:05 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_503779
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_503779
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_503779