Proceeding contribution from Baroness Wilcox (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 5 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Energy Bill.
Energy Bill
moved, as an amendment to Amendment No. 60, Amendment No. 63: 63: After Clause 90, line 52, at end insert— ““““exempted fossil fuel supplies”” means, if the regulations so provide, fossil fuels supplied— (a) to a specified class of consumer, and (b) for a specified purpose;”” The noble Baroness said: My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing the amendment. As welcome as it is that the Government have realised the importance that heat will play in reaching our renewables target, and as much as I am glad that they have taken the opportunity that the Bill presents to ensure that they can quickly introduce the necessary scheme, I hope that such vague provisions will not become usual practice. It is therefore critical that the Minister gives this House as much detail as possible, even on this last set of amendments, on how the renewable heat incentive scheme will operate, and will commit to participating fully in both meaningful consultation with and detailed reporting to this House on the Government's intentions as they develop. My amendments are designed to clear up one concern that has already been raised by an outside stakeholder as a result of the drafting of the provision. Can the Minister confirm that the provisions will not necessarily impose the levy on fossil-fuel powered CHP plants? Of course, renewable heat production is the primary target of the provision, and rightly so, but it would be extremely counterproductive if the rush in which the amendment has been produced causes the unintended consequence of damaging the development of a technology that has the potential to be so helpful in reducing our carbon emissions, enhancing our energy security and lowering our energy costs. I am also interested in probing the provisions on where heat pumps fall. Do they allow for the payment to be made to producers of heat through that technology; if not, why not? Finally, I again ask for as much detail as possible on the implementation timetable of the scheme. Speed is of course of the essence, and I look forward to hearing the Minister's response. I beg to move.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 705 c262-3
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Devolved matters Consumers Decommissioning Costs Combined heat and power Licensing Information Energy Electricity generation Oil Planning permission Payments Nuclear power Power stations Nuclear power stations Parliamentary scrutiny Prices Microgeneration Offshore industry Scotland Safety Renewable energy Technology Wind power Carbon emissions Renewables obligation Feed-in tariffs Statutory instruments
- Legislation
- Energy Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:27:14 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_506206
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_506206
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_506206