Proceeding contribution from Robert Marshall-Andrews (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 11 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on Heathrow.
Heathrow
The Secretary of State talks about not increasing the area in which noise will be a significant blight. Does he not understand that area is only one of the parameters? The other is the extent and the timing of the noise. One of the things that concerns most people about Heathrow is the end of runway alternation. At the moment, at least half of their days are silent. For the other half, of course, they live with aircraft noise, because of where they live. Does he not understand that area is immaterial? It is the timing of the noise that is important. Will he address that problem?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 482 c657
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Aviation Construction Airports Air routes Heathrow Airport Pollution Noise
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:25:24 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_507613
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_507613
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_507613