Proceeding contribution from Graham Stringer (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 11 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on Heathrow.
Heathrow
I am glad that I have sat through this debate, if only to listen to the right hon. Member for Suffolk, Coastal (Mr. Gummer), who made a clear and rhetorical speech. It often helps to listen to a speech of such clarity, so as to realise why its arguments are wrong. What the right hon. Gentleman was really saying was that building a third runway at Heathrow would be the end of this Government’s commitment to the environment, and of our leadership in Europe. It was a millennial speech. But he makes that argument in the context of hubs all over Europe—not just the ones that have been mentioned, such as Charles de Gaulle, Frankfurt and Schiphol, but Madrid, Copenhagen and others—increasing their capacity. Such contentions are absurd when viewed in that broader context.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 482 c719
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Aviation Construction Airports Air routes Heathrow Airport Pollution Noise
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:17:22 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_507769
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_507769
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_507769