Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Counter-Terrorism Bill.


Counter-Terrorism Bill

moved Amendment No. 48A: 48A: Clause 74, leave out Clause 74 The noble Baroness said: My Lords, this amendment concerns the definition of terrorism. We have tabled it once again. When we discussed the Government’s intention to amend the definition of terrorism in Committee, the overwhelming view was that it was unnecessary. That remains the view of these Benches. As I said then, the term ““racial”” is not substantive with regard to motivation or end, unlike the terms ““political””, ““religious”” or ““ideological””. That is the nub of this amendment. We cannot conceive of a circumstance in which a racial cause is not already encompassed in the phrase ““political, religious or ideological””. The Minister failed in Committee to convince us of the need to amend the definition and I hope that he might now agree to remove the term. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
705 c605 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Criminal proceedings Armed forces Death Assets Business Crown Prosecution Service Coroners Evidence Human rights EU law Financial institutions Northern Ireland Police Nuclear weapons Police custody Money laundering Race relations Terrorism Surveillance Right of search Treasury Anti-terrorism control orders Financial Action Task Force Weapons of mass destruction Notification orders
Legislation
Counter-terrorism Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk