Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hanningfield (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 18 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Local Transport Bill [HL].


Local Transport Bill [HL]

My Lords, I am slightly confused by the last part of this debate. Let me return to the amendment put forward by the noble Lord, Lord Rosser. I have been in local government for a long time and I know that there can be gerrymandering before elections. It is important that the democratic results of an election are reflected in the membership of ITAs, so I share some of the concerns expressed by the noble Lords, Lord Rosser and Lord Bradshaw. I know that this will be referred to in secondary legislation, so I hope that the Minister can give us some reassurance on that point. On hybridisation, I have a lot of sympathy for what the noble Lord, Lord Bradshaw, was saying, but I have become more confused about it as a result of the timescales that the Minister has put forward and the delays that this might cause. I, too, support the democratic process through which people have a right to present their case to us, but perhaps the Minister might clarify how he can help this situation.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
705 c1096 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Staff Complaints Contracts Bus services Delegated legislation Exemptions Motor vehicles Parking Membership Workplace pensions Public consultation Public transport Railways Parliamentary scrutiny Passengers Passenger transport executives Pension rights Standards Roads Transport Scotland Waste Road works Tolls Traffic Commissioners Local transport plans Hybrid instruments Passenger Focus Rail Passengers Council
Legislation
Local Transport Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk