Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 18 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Local Transport Bill [HL].

Local Transport Bill [HL]

moved, as an amendment to the Motion that this House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 167, leave out ““agree”” and insert ““disagree””. The noble Lord said: My Lords, I have spoken to this amendment with Amendment No. 159. I believe that the Minister has exaggerated the extent of the delay because there is a certain parallel movement in these procedures. In fact, it could be possible to accommodate our hybrid instruments procedure within the 12-month timeframe that the Government contemplate will be needed between the publication of the ITA governance review scheme by an ITA or local authority, and the making of the resulting ITA order by the Secretary of State. I beg to move. On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 167A) shall be agreed to? Their Lordships divided: Contents, 43; Not-Contents, 87. On Question, Motion agreed to.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
705 c1098-9 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Staff Complaints Contracts Bus services Delegated legislation Exemptions Motor vehicles Parking Membership Workplace pensions Public consultation Public transport Railways Parliamentary scrutiny Passengers Passenger transport executives Pension rights Standards Roads Transport Scotland Waste Road works Tolls Traffic Commissioners Local transport plans Hybrid instruments Passenger Focus Rail Passengers Council
Legislation
Local Transport Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk