Proceeding contribution from Baroness Manningham-Buller (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 24 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Counter-Terrorism Bill.
Counter-Terrorism Bill
My Lords, I have sympathy with the amendment but I see a practical problem: if the material is released to the coroner and he judges its release beyond him with regard to prejudicing national security, even if so seriously redacted that it is of little use to the workings of the coroners court, what happens then? That is the crunch. These look like safe recommendations to protect national security—what the noble Baroness, Lady Miller, described as a sort of tiering of protection—but if the High Court judge says that the release of the material would prejudice national security and it is so severely redacted as to be of little use to the conduct of the coroners court, I am not clear what then happens.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 705 c1299
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Crime Courts Detainees Death Costs Coroners Electronic surveillance Evidence Genetics Judges National security Personal records Terrorism Remand in custody
- Legislation
- Counter-terrorism Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-13 12:19:12 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_511483
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_511483
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_511483