Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 24 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Counter-Terrorism Bill.


Counter-Terrorism Bill

My Lords, on the one hand, his decision is challengeable; on the other—in answer to the noble Baroness’s point—it is for him to decide whether the information is of any use in determining the cause of death. If, through redaction or whatever, he decides that the information is not of any use to a jury or to himself, he will not rely on it in any way. I heard only today that the Ministry of Defence was unwilling to support the costs of the family of a sergeant who was killed in a collision between helicopters last year, in an inquest that is to take place a week next Tuesday. We have to look broadly at inquests and at how families are to be properly supported in making representations before them. The proposal in the amendment is something that we can do now to ensure that delayed inquests can be heard and that the families can have some satisfaction.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
705 c1302 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Crime Courts Detainees Death Costs Coroners Electronic surveillance Evidence Genetics Judges National security Personal records Terrorism Remand in custody
Legislation
Counter-terrorism Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk