Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 January 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Banking Bill.


Banking Bill

The Minister said that Clause 39 sets out everything that could possibly be done, but it does not replicate what happens in ordinary commercial transactions. I am content to withdraw the amendment but the Minister has to understand that effectively the Government will be left on the record as saying that risks in transfers involving foreign property will lie completely with transferees without any possibility of recourse. Clause 39 is just about making lots of efforts—that is all it does. Once the efforts have been made and they do not work, it is down to the transferee. If the Government want that left on the record for all to see, I am entirely happy with that, but I just say to them that, where foreign property is involved, those using these powers will be in for a very hard time with any lawyer on the other end.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
706 c1319 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Contracts Codes of practice Accountability Directors Assets Bank services Banks Competition Delegated legislation Bank of England Employment Liability EU law Financial institutions Insolvency Private sector Protection Pay Public appointments Property transfer Public sector Parliamentary scrutiny Staff Nationalisation Shares Taxation Shareholders Treasury
Legislation
Banking Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk