Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Viscount Eccles (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 January 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Banking Bill.


Banking Bill

I wish to speak to Amendment 104A and in support of Amendment 104. I seek to introduce another piece of greater certainty into the clause by leaving out, "““in particular, have regard to the desirability of ensuring””," so that the clause reads, "““In making regulations the Treasury shall ensure that””." We have discussed ““have regard to””, but this set of words also includes ““desirability”” so we have two uncertainties. The language is another example of ““now you see it, now you don’t””; that is to say, there is an intent but how far will the intent be translated into what happens? This is an area of great sensitivity and there is a need to achieve equity. I suggest that certainty is needed.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
706 c1539 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Compensation Codes of practice Assets Bank services Banks Competition Delegated legislation Bank of England Capital Liability Financial services Financial institutions Insolvency Financial Services Authority Private sector Property transfer Public sector Mergers Nationalisation Scotland Small businesses Valuation Treasury
Legislation
Banking Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk