Proceeding contribution from Viscount Eccles (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 January 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Banking Bill.
Banking Bill
I would be more comforted if I were certain that trustees would not think that the partial transfer procedure was likely to have overridden their power to act as efficiently as they would have liked to have acted on behalf of the members of the scheme. That is another reason why I sincerely hope that more thought will be given to Clause 71. Whereas much of the Bill could be shortened, there is a case for spelling out in more detail the provisions with regard to pension schemes. Meanwhile, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 116A withdrawn.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 706 c1585
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Contracts Compensation Codes of practice Company law Companies Directors Administration Assets Bank services Banks Delegated legislation Bank of England Finance Liability Financial institutions Insolvency Financial Services Authority Holding companies Foreign companies Private sector Pay Powers Workplace pensions Property transfer Public sector Partnerships Nationalisation Stocks and shares Taxation Treasury British Bankers' Association Financial Services Compensation Scheme National Loans Fund Statutory instruments Liquidation committees
- Legislation
- Banking Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 18:50:36 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_520886
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_520886
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_520886