Proceeding contribution from Lord Mandelson (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 2 February 2009. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Industrial Action: Lindsey Oil Refinery.
Industrial Action: Lindsey Oil Refinery
My Lords, I understand very well the point being made and the case being argued by my noble friend Lord Lea. I accept that where rights or entitlements that have been collectively negotiated and bargained are higher than the statutory minima, of course it is possible for these collectively bargained standards to be accepted, operated and implemented by all sides, but they need to do so voluntarily. In many cases, they are operated in that way. As I said in the Statement, in the case of the Lindsey refinery, all subcontractors adhere to the national agreement for the engineering construction industry which governs terms and conditions, working hours and pay. However, I do not think it is reasonable for us to seek to change the law in respect of this European directive that would extend collectively bargained entitlements to all companies and employees in adjacent employment. That is not a right that is enjoyed in UK law, let alone EU law.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 707 c479
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Contracts ACAS Equality Industrial disputes EU law Free movement of labour Oil Pay Recruitment Migrant workers Refineries Italy Portugal Total UK Immingham
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-16 20:27:23 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_524911
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_524911
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_524911