Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 9 February 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [HL].

Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [HL]

The Minister’s last comments were to an amendment that I thought I was talking to about an hour and a half ago. There is some confusion with the numbers and the groupings today. I am grateful for her reply. Am I to understand, therefore, that the intention is that in every case the whole of the national park will be allocated to one region for this purpose? That is probably sensible in most cases, but I am not sure that it is sensible in the case of the Peak District. That might be thought about. I am grateful for that clarification and for the promise of sending us even more correspondence; I look forward to it. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 166ZC withdrawn. Amendments 166A and 166B not moved.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
707 c298GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Accountability Climate change Design County councils Housing Further education Environment Energy Learning and Skills Council for England Green belt District councils Local government Ministerial powers Membership Planning Public consultation Parish and town councils Police authorities National parks Regional planning and development Sustainable development Social rented housing Regional development agencies Regional government Local strategic partnerships Regional spatial strategies Local area agreements
Legislation
Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk