Proceeding contribution from Lord Williams of Elvel (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 9 February 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Banking Bill.
Banking Bill
My Lords, before my noble friend responds to that point and before he sits down—I am sure he is going to sit down fairly soon—does he recognise that we are at Third Reading and therefore that long speeches in the course of ministerial statements are simply out of order? There is no point in arguing at Third Reading for different wording. The only way that different wording can be achieved on any of these amendments is by the noble Lord, Lord Goodlad, asking the House to approve his amendment, or any other amendment, and that going down to another place where the Government would have to produce an amendment in lieu.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 707 c961
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Contracts Compensation Consumers Assets Bank services Banks Delegated legislation Bank of England Deposits Finance Investment Financial institutions Insolvency Financial Services Authority Financial markets Protection Public interest Property transfer Scotland Treasury Financial Services Compensation Scheme Retrospective legislation
- Legislation
- Banking Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 09:24:38 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_527457
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_527457
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_527457