Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Goodlad (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 9 February 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Banking Bill.


Banking Bill

My Lords, I am advised that, procedurally, it is expected that I should say very few words about this extremely significant debate. The Minister made a detailed and eloquent speech explaining the Government’s decision. He received no support from anyone in the Chamber and opposition from the Back Benches of the Labour Party, the Cross Benches and the Liberal Democrat Party. The Front Benches of the Conservative Party and the Liberal Democrat Party were silent on the matter, which is, according to taste, welcome, disgraceful or sinister. I am content not to press the amendments tabled in my name and those of other noble Lords in the hope that the Government will, at Commons consideration of Lords amendments, consider adjusting Amendment 22, so that the Treasury can make orders with retrospective effect only if it considers that doing so is exceptionally in the public interest. In deference to the noble Lord, Lord Williams of Elvel, whose expertise on Third Reading procedure is not exceeded by anybody and who has a batting average in first-class cricket of more than 25, I shall not move the amendment. Amendment 20 not moved. Amendment 21 not moved.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
707 c973 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Contracts Compensation Consumers Assets Bank services Banks Delegated legislation Bank of England Deposits Finance Investment Financial institutions Insolvency Financial Services Authority Financial markets Protection Public interest Property transfer Scotland Treasury Financial Services Compensation Scheme Retrospective legislation
Legislation
Banking Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk