Proceeding contribution from Pat McFadden (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 11 February 2009. It occurred during Opposition day on Royal Mail.
Royal Mail
I believe that the company said that it had no such plans. Hooper considered the background of change that I have set out and made three interlinked recommendations. The first was that the Government should address the historic pension deficit in Royal Mail. The second was that there should be a strategic partnership between Royal Mail and another postal or network company. The third was that the regulatory system should be changed.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 487 c1445;487 c1443
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Cost effectiveness Competition Industrial relations Innovation Government assistance Private sector Workplace pensions Loans Prices Pension funds Postal services Ofcom Postal Services Commission Post Office Modernisation Standards Regulation Technology Royal Mail Universal service obligation Postal Services Sector Review
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-16 20:17:29 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_528862
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_528862
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_528862