Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Pat McFadden (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 11 February 2009. It occurred during Opposition day on Royal Mail.


Royal Mail

We all have an interest in this issue, and all right hon. and hon. Members' views on it are valid. Addressing the pension deficit is not an easy decision. If we do that for Royal Mail, taxpayers are entitled to ask what change they will get in return. How will taxpayers have confidence that the Royal Mail can make the changes it needs to make to cope with falling mail volumes and new technology? That issue is critical. As the Hooper report rightly says, only one company can deliver the USO; only one company can send a postman or woman up every garden path in the country six days a week. The health of Royal Mail matters, and we have to take the decisions necessary to secure its future.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
487 c1446;487 c1444 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Cost effectiveness Competition Industrial relations Innovation Government assistance Private sector Workplace pensions Loans Prices Pension funds Postal services Ofcom Postal Services Commission Post Office Modernisation Standards Regulation Technology Royal Mail Universal service obligation Postal Services Sector Review
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk