Proceeding contribution from John Heppell (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 11 February 2009. It occurred during Opposition day on Royal Mail.
Royal Mail
My hon. Friend the Member for Reading, West (Martin Salter) asked the then shadow Business Secretary:"““If I am to be tempted to vote for the motion, will he give an undertaking on behalf of his party to put £1.7 billion of investment into the network so that it can be sustained in a good old socialist fashion up to 2011?””" The then shadow Business Secretary said:"““I will not do that””.—[Official Report, 19 March 2008; Vol. 473, c. 950.]" That is fairly specific. If I am wrong, I would be happy to give way to the right hon. and learned Member for Rushcliffe so that he can get up and give a guarantee now. As we are talking about the Hooper review, will he give a guarantee that the Opposition will back the Government's view and do something about the pensions deficit?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 487 c1467;487 c1465
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Cost effectiveness Competition Industrial relations Innovation Government assistance Private sector Workplace pensions Loans Prices Pension funds Postal services Ofcom Postal Services Commission Post Office Modernisation Standards Regulation Technology Royal Mail Universal service obligation Postal Services Sector Review
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-16 20:30:31 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_528945
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_528945
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_528945