Proceeding contribution from Ian Pearson (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 11 February 2009. It occurred during Opposition day on Royal Mail.
Royal Mail
I was merely expressing my own view that such an option should not be ruled out. My hon. Friend will have heard the figures that I gave. He will understand the position that Royal Mail is in. A pensions deficit that was valued at £5.9 billion nearly 12 months ago will in fact be substantially worse, and the projected £400 million annual deficit for the foreseeable future can also only get worse. We need to sort out the position; the question is, what is the best way for us to sort it out? Would it be best to sort it out purely through Government money, or to bring in private-sector capital in the form of a minority shareholding while retaining existing expertise and management?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 487 c1478;487 c1476
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Cost effectiveness Competition Industrial relations Innovation Government assistance Private sector Workplace pensions Loans Prices Pension funds Postal services Ofcom Postal Services Commission Post Office Modernisation Standards Regulation Technology Royal Mail Universal service obligation Postal Services Sector Review
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-16 20:30:16 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_528962
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_528962
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_528962