Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 5 March 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill [HL].


Health Bill [HL]

This has been a useful debate and I thank all those who have taken part in it. I am grateful to the Minister for his reply. I was not concerned that the independence of Monitor was being interfered with within the framework of its current responsibilities; that was not the focus of my remarks. I am concerned that the Government have not looked creatively enough at the alternatives. I do not know what has led them to conclude that an insolvency regime would be less likely to deliver good value for money for the taxpayer than the alternatives—perhaps we can go into that—but for those who do business now with foundation trusts it is clear that there will be no such thing as an unsecured creditor.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
708 c338GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Administration Advertising Canada Health services Finance Governing bodies Health hazards Exemptions Insolvency Innovation Health authorities NHS Patients NHS trusts NHS foundation trusts Standards Young people Shops Tobacco Iceland Prizes Monitor Care Quality Commission
Legislation
Health Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk