Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 5 March 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill [HL].
Health Bill [HL]
I thank the Minister for that reply, which partially reassures me. I am always anxious to spare Ministers the prospect of judicial review. If we can arrange things so that the law obliges Ministers to be as transparent and open as possible about the reasons for their decisions, it will avoid unnecessary heartache, effort and expense for those who object to those decisions. I take the point that Parliament will be able to scrutinise the decision. It would be helpful to Parliament if there were an explanation of the Minister’s decision published at the same time as the decision itself. Nevertheless, I note what the Minister has said; I do not think that there is anything more I can add, and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 81 withdrawn. Clause 13 agreed. Clause 14 agreed. Schedule 2 agreed. Clauses 15 to 17 agreed. Schedule 3 agreed. Sitting suspended.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 708 c351GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Children Administration Advertising Canada Health services Finance Governing bodies Health hazards Exemptions Insolvency Innovation Health authorities NHS Patients NHS trusts NHS foundation trusts Standards Young people Shops Tobacco Iceland Prizes Monitor Care Quality Commission
- Legislation
- Health Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:46:36 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_535040
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_535040
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_535040