Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord West of Spithead (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 24 March 2009. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Data Retention (EC Directive) Regulations 2009.


Data Retention (EC Directive) Regulations 2009

My Lords, the decision on access will be taken in this Parliament, but that decision is totally irrelevant if we do not keep the data. If we do not agree to keep this data, any discussion about access is irrelevant because they are not being kept. We have had a lot of debate about access and there have been some very interesting points. But this is about making sure that the data are kept. I think we all agree that we should have that data. We all know how valuable they are: 95 per cent of all serious cases rely on that data. Are we really suggesting that these data should not be kept? If we do not keep them, as I say, access to them becomes irrelevant, and that is the key reason why we need them. Therefore, I believe that the amendment is redundant. The directive is an important building block that will help the police and the security and intelligence agencies when they need access. Furthermore, we will have an opportunity to debate access. For those reasons, I ask the noble Baroness to withdraw her amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
709 c636-7 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Data protection Databases Crime prevention Cooperation Direct marketing Electronic surveillance Evidence Intelligence services ICT EU law Information Industry Internet Email Local government Powers Privacy Public bodies Mobile phones Monitoring Standards Telecommunications Security Telephones
Legislation
Data Retention (EC Directive) Regulations 2009
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk