Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 2 April 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Saving Gateway Accounts Bill.
Saving Gateway Accounts Bill
Well, I will try the second question that the Minister did not answer before deciding what to do with the amendment. I also asked him why there was no restriction to residents. The Minister has explained how residence and ordinary residence would form the basis, but is it possible for somebody to be deemed to be ordinarily resident under the draft regulations, which fit within the power given here, without having any residence connection with UK? One aspect of my amendment was to seek to anchor the regulations in at least the mere fact of residence. That is to say, a person had to be resident, but could then go on and have something that deemed him to be ordinarily resident without escaping from being resident.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 709 c314-5GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Compensation Carers Administration Costs Bank services Delegated legislation Advisory services Department for Work and Pensions Eligibility Information Financial services European communities Domicil Pension credit Pensioners Personal savings Low incomes Social security benefits Welfare tax credits Take-up Revenue and Customs Saving gateway Financial Services Compensation Scheme
- Legislation
- Saving Gateway Accounts Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:29:04 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_546279
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_546279
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_546279