Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 27 April 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Postal Services Bill [HL].


Postal Services Bill [HL]

Having dealt with paragraph (b), I turn to the interaction between that paragraph and paragraph (c). Paragraph (b) sets more or less objective criteria on which a service falls within the scope. Paragraph (c) allows Ofcom to assess whether a service falls within the scope on the basis of its interchangeability. Our next group of amendments looks at the basis on which it makes that assessment, so I shall leave my concerns about that until then. However, the current drafting appears to ensure that a service must be considered as within the scope if it fulfils paragraph (b), even if Ofcom does not consider it interchangeable. It is entirely automatic; even if Ofcom does not think that it is interchangeable—perhaps the service operates only one day a week—this clause requires Ofcom to consider it as within scope. I cannot believe that that is the Government’s intention, and I look forward to reassurance from the Secretary of State. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
710 c13-4 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Consumers Appeals Disadvantaged Audit Costs Bank services Business Closures Competition Correspondence Borrowing Finance Fees and charges EU law Investment Private sector Low incomes Protection Public sector Post offices Prices Postal services Parcels Ofcom Postal Services Commission Post Office Standards Regulation Royal Mail Universal service obligation
Legislation
Postal Services Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk