Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Sion Simon (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 5 May 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill.


Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill

I am very grateful for that, Mr. Deputy Speaker. New clauses 1 and 11 are not necessary. In terms of new clause 1, an ongoing benchmarking programme already exists. As part of the capital investment programme, almost all further education colleges—some 98 per cent.—are already participating in an existing property benchmarking programme called eMandate overseen by the LSC, and that programme will continue under the chief executive of skills funding. The eMandate programme captures data on an annual basis from all participating colleges in the FE sector. Those data include information on the quality of their estate and their estate management costs. Participation in the eMandate programme is open to all FE colleges and is compulsory for any college that wants to apply for public capital funding for building. We simply do not need the kind of stocktake described in new clause 1, because precisely that process already exists, and because nobody has suggested that a lack of that kind of information caused the problems with the FE capital programme.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
492 c93 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Conditions of employment Databases Buildings Bureaucracy Apprentices Finance Education Further education Learning and Skills Council for England Protection Standards Special educational needs Training Young offenders Social services Secure accommodation UN Convention on the Rights of the Child GCSE Local safeguarding children boards Young offender institutions GCE A-level Ofqual Building colleges for the future programme
Legislation
Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk