Proceeding contribution from Lord Clarke of Hampstead (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 11 May 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Postal Services Bill [HL].
Postal Services Bill [HL]
My Lords, more than a flavour. The record of this short debate should make clear what Clause 16(4) actually means in terms of, ""treating a new public scheme as an occupational pension scheme"," and all that goes with an occupational pension scheme—that is, the right of consultation. If I was a difficult person, I would be arguing that it needed a trustee’s agreement, rather than just being consulted, but I think enough has been said. There is very little between us. I shall look at what has been said. I am sure that the trustees of both the existing scheme and the new scheme will be heartened to know that the occupational pension scheme general terms of consultation will apply. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 34 withdrawn.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 710 c867
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Consumers Companies Directors Annual reports Finance Government shareholding Protection Pensions Post offices Prices Postal services Ofcom Post Office Regulation Taxation Royal Mail Reorganisation Universal service obligation Shared ownership schemes TNT Employee ownership
- Legislation
- Postal Services Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 11:34:26 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_555489
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_555489
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_555489