Proceeding contribution from Linda Gilroy (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 27 October 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [Lords].
Marine and Coastal Access Bill [Lords]
I follow the logic of my hon. Friend's argument, but given my earlier comments, does he see merit in the REA advancing the case for the MMO as a statutory adviser and formalising the MMO's role in relation to the Secretary of State in the MCZ designation process, and its relationship to the policy statement?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 498 c179
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Conservation Coastal areas Fisheries Environment protection Electricity generation Pay Powers Planning Staff Sustainable development Renewable energy Rights of way Water power Seas and oceans Wind power Marine and Fisheries Agency Marine Management Organisation Infrastructure Planning Commission Marine conservation zones
- Legislation
- Marine and Coastal Access Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:24:30 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_588596
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_588596
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_588596