Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Darling of Roulanish (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 30 November 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Financial Services Bill.


Financial Services Bill

That could be the case, but the Bank's principal responsibility for 10 years related very much to monetary policy, and quantitative easing is part of that. I worry what we would bring to the issue if we simply backed the FSA into the Bank of England, other than that one person would nominally be in charge of the whole organisation. As I have said, I understand the case that others make, but I approach it from an entirely practical perspective and regrettably—I use the word advisedly—I have had a lot of experience of this issue in the last two and half years. I have observed first hand some of the do's and don'ts, and I may set them down one day—[Hon. Members: "Ah!"] Some of my proposals and the lessons that I draw are reflected in the Bill. I do not want to labour the point; I simply think that the proposal to put everything under the Bank of England is inherently risky, and I would not do that.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
501 c876-7 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Consumers Banks Credit Education Financial services Financial institutions International cooperation Financial Services Authority EU action Protection Pay Powers Regulation Stocks and shares Treasury Financial Services Compensation Scheme Council for Financial Stability Class actions
Legislation
Financial Services Bill 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk