Proceeding contribution from William Cash (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 30 November 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Financial Services Bill.
Financial Services Bill
I entirely agree with the Chancellor in his prediction. With respect to majority voting and the architecture that has been devised under the regulations, which we will debate again later this week, how is it that he can talk about national supervision, somehow giving an impression that we might be in control, when the real question is whether we are governed by majority voting in all these matters, as a result of which we will not be able to sustain the kind of City of London that we need in relation to GDP, as I said to the Prime Minister the other day? What is the Chancellor's answer to that question?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 501 c880
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Consumers Banks Credit Education Financial services Financial institutions International cooperation Financial Services Authority EU action Protection Pay Powers Regulation Stocks and shares Treasury Financial Services Compensation Scheme Council for Financial Stability Class actions
- Legislation
- Financial Services Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-11 09:58:26 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_597624
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_597624
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_597624