Proceeding contribution from William Cash (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 30 November 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Financial Services Bill.
Financial Services Bill
In the context of the various tiers and hierarchies of legal intervention that exist, the hon. Gentleman's pursuit of the simplicity that he set out at the beginning of his remarks, and his desire not to have too much duplication, would he concede that it would be far better if the matters to which he has referred did not end up being adjudicated in, for example, the European Court of Justice? The decisions to which he has referred would then all be adjudicated under a series of directives that would ultimately take control away from our courts and hand it over to the ECJ. Does he not see the inconsistency in his argument?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 501 c901
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Consumers Banks Credit Education Financial services Financial institutions International cooperation Financial Services Authority EU action Protection Pay Powers Regulation Stocks and shares Treasury Financial Services Compensation Scheme Council for Financial Stability Class actions
- Legislation
- Financial Services Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-11 09:58:20 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_597668
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_597668
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_597668