Proceeding contribution from Gordon Prentice (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 18 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Crime and Security Bill.
Crime and Security Bill
Why is it, then, that we have received a briefing from the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which will be aware of the research to which my friend has alluded, advising us that if my friend's proposals go through,""the Government is likely to be in breach of Article 8 of the Convention and be acting unlawfully"?" How come the commission has got it wrong?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 504 c37
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Data protection Databases Devolved matters Biometrics Crime Anti-social behaviour Bureaucracy Airguns Convictions Fees and charges Evidence Immobilisation of vehicles Licensing Human rights Dogs Genetics Domestic abuse Ethnic groups Private sector Police Powers Prisons Mobile phones Scotland Sentencing Terrorism Stop and search Young people Young offenders Victims Security guards Anti-social behaviour orders Parenting orders
- Legislation
- Crime and Security Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-11 09:58:49 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_610295
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_610295
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_610295