Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lawson of Blaby (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 23 February 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Financial Services Bill.


Financial Services Bill

I thought that that error might be made by someone, which is why I took the precaution of bringing the opening page of chapter 32, "Fraud and the City", of my memoirs. I will not read the whole thing, but it begins: ""It might seem surprising at first sight that a Government, and a Chancellor, so committed to deregulation, including financial deregulation, should have spent so much time over, and been so concerned with, financial regulation. Indeed, some have seen it as a tacit admission that financial deregulation went too far. But this is to be confused with words"." Incidentally, this was published in 1992, so we have a lot of benefit of hindsight. It continues: ""Financial deregulation in no way implies the absence of financial regulation for prudential purposes and for the prevention, so far as possible, of fraud. Economic freedom, as much as political freedom, is possible only within the framework of the rule of law"." I went to considerable lengths to improve in the Banking Act 1987 prudential regulation of the financial sector in this country.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
717 c955-6 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Codes of practice Consumers Directors Damages Bank services Banks Civil proceedings Credit Advisory services Credit unions Bank of England Finance Education EU law Investment Financial services Financial institutions Financial Services Authority Financial markets Economic situation Northern Ireland Pay Powers Public consultation Loans Staff Regulation Stocks and shares Treasury London Stock Exchange Council for Financial Stability
Legislation
Financial Services Bill 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk