Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 15 March 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Financial Services Bill.


Financial Services Bill

My Lords, I thank the Minister for that response. He said that the Council for Financial Stability would not get involved in any such decisions and that Amendment 25 was therefore not necessary. We have pretty well established that the Council for Financial Stability does not have any real meaning, so perhaps Amendment 25 is not relevant. However, I am less clear about Amendment 28. We know that the Government did not inform Parliament about the HBOS and RBS arrangements until the Governor of the Bank of England had informed Parliament. That clearly did not work, and the fact that the Permanent Secretary at the Treasury is acutely aware of parliamentary accountability seems not to have achieved a result that many would have found satisfactory. I am not sure whether we can leave it to Ministers of the day, as advised by their Permanent Secretaries. I shall withdraw Amendment 25, but I give notice that, in a minute or so, I shall press Amendment 28 formally. Amendment 25 withdrawn. Clause 3, as amended, agreed. Clause 4 : Definitions Clause 4 : Definitions Amendment 26 not moved. Clause 4 agreed. Amendment 27 not moved. Amendment 28 Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
718 c541 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Codes of practice Banks Bank of England Financial services Government assistance Financial Services Authority Financial markets Economic situation Loans Meetings Regulation Treasury Council for Financial Stability
Legislation
Financial Services Bill 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk