Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Knight of Collingtree (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 17 March 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Flood and Water Management Bill.


Flood and Water Management Bill

The Minister said that money had already been allocated for rescue. One can envisage that plans to avoid flood dangers could be in a separate box from plans to rescue people from floods, but when the Minister refers to money being available, is it ring-fenced money for rescue or could there be a leak? One could envisage a situation where rescue efforts would be expected and would, I know, be provided by these people. If the planning included certain arrangements, it would be easier for rescues to take place. I can see some kind of meshing of this money. It would clarify the situation for me if the Minister could make it plain whether the money that will be made available for flood management is in a different category from the money for the rescue services, which would be solely for them, not for planning.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
718 c248-9GC 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Agriculture Costs Coastal areas Coastal erosion Fees and charges Land Flood control Land drainage Inland waterways Emergency services Fire and rescue services Equipment Horticulture Floods National Assembly for Wales Water Voluntary organisations Wales Rural areas Urban areas Water companies Sewers Rescue services Reservoirs Social tariffs
Legislation
Flood and Water Management Bill 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk