Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 July 2010. It occurred during Ministerial statement on NHS: White Paper.


NHS: White Paper

I have two brief questions. First, in the Statement the Minister referred to outcomes. Given that secondary care sometimes has patients—sadly too often—referred late because of delayed diagnosis in primary care, how is the clinical care of the general practitioner going to be held to account in this system? My second question relates to the Minister’s mention of "any willing provider". What security will there be to ensure that a provider cannot introduce a loss-leader service with clearly defined boundaries in order to gain a market share, and to prevent complex and difficult cases not covered by that provider being dumped on the NHS? This has been the experience with some private practices where patients are in private hospitals but, when things become too complicated, they are shipped down the road to the local NHS intensive care unit.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
720 c540-1 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Bureaucracy Health services Finance Health authorities General practitioners Local government NHS Medical records Primary care trusts Patients' rights Non-departmental public bodies NHS foundation trusts Standards Regulation Social services Social enterprises Patient choice schemes Monitor Care Quality Commission NHS Commissioning Board Healthwatch England
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk