Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Gauke (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 July 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HC) and Debate on bill on Finance Bill.


Finance Bill

What I can say is that given how IPT is currently structured and where it is levied, it does not apply to long-term insurance; the conclusion to be drawn about something that falls within the definition of long-term insurance is fairly logical. However, in respect of the types of insurance that are affected, insurers have the right to respond to the tax as they see fit. They are not obliged to pass on IPT through higher premiums. [Interruption.] We recognise that many insurers will pass it on to their customers through higher premiums, but I will not be dragged into the detail of the amendment tabled by the hon. Member for Nottingham East (Chris Leslie). The question was asked whether further regulation should be imposed on insurers, making them display prominently how much is being paid in IPT. Unlike VAT, IPT is a tax on insurance, so there is no obligation to pass it on or to recover it for businesses. We do not think that that would be appropriate. Insurers are, of course, perfectly free to display the IPT rate on documentation, and many do so. Requiring them to do so, however, would be burdensome and unnecessary.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
513 c1130 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Travel Corporation tax Annuities Allowances Driving Income tax Exemptions Insurance Health insurance Inheritance tax Income Insurance premium tax Pensions Members Older people Working hours Tax allowances Tax avoidance Tax yields Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority Motor insurance
Legislation
Finance Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk