Proceeding contribution from David Gauke (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 July 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HC) and Debate on bill on Finance Bill.
Finance Bill
I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for underlining an earlier point that I made—that it is not necessary to introduce regulation in this area. As I say, we anticipate that it will be passed on, but it is not mandatory. I am not denying that position. Despite these modest impacts, the IPT rate increases will contribute more than £450 million a year to reducing the deficit. As I said, such decisions have been forced on us by the economic circumstances that the UK finds itself in, and they have not been taken lightly. We are confident, however, that this modest rise in IPT, which leaves the main rate of the tax significantly lower than that of many of our European competitors, is a means of raising much-needed revenue that will not have a significant impact on households, businesses or the insurance industry.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 513 c1131
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Travel Corporation tax Annuities Allowances Driving Income tax Exemptions Insurance Health insurance Inheritance tax Income Insurance premium tax Pensions Members Older people Working hours Tax allowances Tax avoidance Tax yields Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority Motor insurance
- Legislation
- Finance Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-06 13:28:18 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_656144
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_656144
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_656144