Proceeding contribution from Mike Weir (Scottish National Party) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 July 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HC) and Debate on bill on Finance Bill.
Finance Bill
I understand the Economic Secretary's point and I am closely following her argument. Does she accept that many people did not get annuities in the past two or three years because the economic position meant that it was simply not a good time to buy them? Those people are effectively being penalised. Would it not be fair, as I suggested in an earlier intervention, to say that everyone had two years from now, while the consultation goes ahead and changes are being made, to consider their position? Perhaps some people will wish to continue as they are, but at least they would have the option, which is rightly being given to people who are approaching 75.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 513 c1172
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Travel Corporation tax Annuities Allowances Driving Income tax Exemptions Insurance Health insurance Inheritance tax Income Insurance premium tax Pensions Members Older people Working hours Tax allowances Tax avoidance Tax yields Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority Motor insurance
- Legislation
- Finance Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-06 13:28:09 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_656243
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_656243
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_656243